Jesus Christ Forums

[Bushmaster]

I am bumping it here for those who haven't seen it yet...

Please read and comment...

Did you know, Mary of Magdalane, who is described as a prostitue in the New Testament, was actually the wife of Jesus Christ? Furthermore, she gave birth to a baby named Sarah and to this day, Jesus Christ's lineage still continues. They are protected from catholics by a secret organization ... (why a secret organization? Does anyone remember Oct. 13, 1307? What happened to those Knights of the Temple? History shows that papacy was never hesitated to use violence towards the events arose against themselves... I don't have to remind the Inquisition, right?) So why do you suppose Mary of Magdalane was pictured as a prostitute in the Bible? The reason is simple; during the Iznik (nicea) Council in 325 A.D., Constantine, who was actually a pagan and who -after seeing how fast Christianity spread- tried to adapt his own paganism into Christianity and create a new religion out of it, later realized that, Jesus(pbuh) having a wife was against the sophistry of so-called "SON OF GOD" For this reason, Mary of Magdalane was described as low as possible to suppress the truth. In addition, this truth was also mentioned in the scriptures like scrolls of Lot Lake (sp?- maybe Lut) which were originally banned by the same council from making it into the New Testament. Throughout history, this truth had been expressed by many artists including Leonardo Da Vinci. For those who are curious out there, can examine the "Last Supper" fresco of Da Vinci. Most people would think there are 12 disciples in that picture but when you look carefully you will see a woman sitting next to Jesus (pbuh) . After Jesus' (pbuh) death, Mary went to France and settled there and gave birth to Sarah. Unfortunately, Christian world had done everything in its power to cover and suppress this truth because it clearly shows the human inclination of Jesus (pbuh) which contradicts the belief of him being the son of god.

Pagan Roman emperor Constantine, was a member of a religion that practiced sun worship, and those times, fast growing Christianity came to a strength that it could easily divide the Roman Empire. Constantine realized that, to keep his political interests unharmed, he had to provide a unity in religion. His choice was Christianity which its followers increased in number day by day... Although, accepting this religion as it was would not end the threat of losing the empire, so he had to change Christianity into something which pagans would accept it without a problem. For this purpose, he gathered the Iznik (nicea) council in 325 A.D. and matters like the date of Easter, the authority of fathers to forgive sins, and most importantly, the deity of Jesus(pbuh) was decided and finalized. Until that time, Jesus(pbuh) had been known and accepted as a mortal man, a prophet who recevied messages from God just like in the islamic belief. Jesus (pbuh) being God was such a good idea that ensured pagans would follow the religion and it was such a good method for bishops to exalt him and make themselves the only authority in religion. But most of the existing documents, scriptures were against this clever plan. Therefore, existing scriptures were sifted carefully and scriptures that were appropriate and close to the new decisions taken by the council were kept (plus minor alterations) and New Testament was created. Fortunately, some of these cursed scriptures that never made it to the Bible, was found (Lot Lake(?) scrolls: found 1950/Nag Hammadi scrolls: found 1945) and they mention about Jesus as he is a mortal man who had human characteristics...


Nag Hammadi and Lot Lake scrolls, Fillibbos (phillippos?) surah mentions of Jesus(pbuh)... "And the savior's wife was Mary of Magdalane, he loved her more than any other disciple and kissed her on the lips. Other disciples resented this and expressed their disapproval and asked him why he loved her more than others...?" Those who are interested can easily find many resources about this.

Peter Longley = Two thousand years later.
Michael Baigent = Holy Blood, Holy Grail
Umberto Eco = Foucault's Pendulum etc etc etc

So what do you think? It sounded way far-fetched to me...
_________________
"Maiorem hac dilectionem nemo habet ut animam suam quis ponat pro amicis suis " Evangelium secundum Iohannem 15:13

U.S. ARMY
AH-64D "Armt Dawg"

[Godn3Persons]

It sounds to funny to me- It sems like it would only appeal to conspiracy theorist (like many muslims).

Its funny how he starts "Did you know" - I just don't unerstand how people twist the facts and then get a best seller....
_________________
Jude 1:3
Dear friends, although I was very eager to write to you about the salvation we share, I felt I had to write and urge you to contend for the faith that was once for all entrusted to the saints.

I am here to defend the truth, and historical accuracy of the Gospels and orthodox Christianity.

[Alpha]

[Godn3Persons]

Alpha- I like your signature- God doesn't edit, its ignorant to think that an omnipotent God can change revelation.
_________________
Jude 1:3
Dear friends, although I was very eager to write to you about the salvation we share, I felt I had to write and urge you to contend for the faith that was once for all entrusted to the saints.

I am here to defend the truth, and historical accuracy of the Gospels and orthodox Christianity.

[Alpha]

[Light]

I was just surfing the net and found a recent article that is in part related to this topic. I was searching for an article on how the BBC is anti Christian and believe me, they are, it is a left-wing station and would rather the world be free from religion. The BBC's reporting is quite dodgy, however here is the link which is about a BBC made documentary that was not so long ago sold to ABC in the U.S.

I'm Catholic, so I found this to be extremely funny.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=35400