Homosexuality is a SIN&God Hates Sin
THE COST!
Who knowing the judgment of God,
|
| CBN - Memphis Group under... |
|---|
|
Posted by
LindaBee2
on Thu Jul 14 at 01:48:am
http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/news/050713a.asp I only really have one thing to say: How dare these protestors butt in on a private family matter? Whenever a Christian else tries to tell gay people that their lifestyle goes against God's will, the response is usually, "Butt out! It's none of your business." Yet when a concerned parent (Who, yes, is a Christian) longs to prevent something disastrous from happen to their child(ren) (both in this life and the next), suddenly gay extremists pop out of the woodwork and start telling the parents what they should do with their own children. What are they so afraid of? I think the answer's obvious. They're terrified of the possibility that the program that Love in Action offers actually works and that people, including Zach Stark, will abandon their homosexuality and pursue godly relationships. If this program actually works, they'll be forced to admit that homosexuals are capable of changing. They don't want to admit that, and so they instead have chosen to take part in a witch hunt. So in short, the protestors should butt out and mind their own business. They should leave this family alone. Haven't they gone through enough? (1) Comment left |
| alright, im really sick o... |
|---|
|
Posted by
Mr.Jenkins
on Fri Jul 8 at 06:56:pm
1.Homosexuality Is Natural. It is very common in the animal kingdom,some Species of apes and monkeys actually perform homosexual acts as a means of fighting over the Females. there is also a large penguin colony in anartica and many of the males are turn gay so they do not overpopulate the colony and cause starvation due to overpopulation. 2.homosexuality is Not a choice. many tests have bee done especially Cat scans. a Gay males brain responds sexuality to Testosterone the same way a Female does. you Cannot change your sexuality, only live in Denial. a God who creates people gay just to send them to hell is Not a god. http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/1115728972245_19/?hub=Health (2) Comments left |
| A parable. |
|---|
|
Posted by
B.J
on Sun Jun 12 at 05:13:pm
Okay this is sort of a parable relating to homosexualtiy(and just so you know, I'm not gay). I guess it could also deal with sexual "sin" in general, or about "sin" itself. I know the common arguement non-Christians such as myself would give are: If God hated homosexuality why would make (or allow to be made) people to be gay?" Well I suppose an aplologetic might fall back on the whole "why make us capapable of evil" question and discuss it terms of giving us the ability of free will and whatnot. But.. somehow that doesn't sit right with me. The gay issue is seems to have a bit more than the "free-will-to-choose-good-and-evil" issue. There is the question of basic morality versus "sin. Well, I thought I'd mention that so you'd understand the parable a bit more... so without further ado Another Theological Parable Involving an Inventor and His Robots (a homosexuality parable) Okay, so lets say I make a bunch of artificially intelligent robots (I use "I" cause I always wanted to make robots when I was a kid Now for the sake of arguement, rather than program them to be purely good, I program them with the ability to choose good and evil, for all the reasons apologetics would give for God giving us that ability (free will...yada yada). But, for now let us say "good and evil" are not (not yet) defined by what any religion or Scripture declares is sin or not, but simply what most decent people declare as good and bad..."basic humanity" if you will. To break it down... the robots can be kind to one another or cruel to one another. Now although I gave them free will, naturally I'm a righteous man, so when a robot hurts or mistreats another robot, I get pissed and smash them to peices with my hammer. Sounds fair enough right? Now, additionaly... (3) Comments left |
| For The Dear Homosexuals ... |
|---|
|
Posted by
im4jesus
on Fri Jun 3 at 08:19:pm
I just want to let each homosexual that comes here searching for answers to know, that Jesus Loves you. He wants to know you better, by you knowing Him better. He ants you to understand that His Love didn't come cheep. but with a HUGE PRICE. And He wants you to know that HE didn't do it for chosen people... no, you are included in this as well. but its your choice, and your alone. Getting salvation is not a religion, my personal thing is, theres too many rules in religion. but its a Relationship with Jesus Christ, and you know what a Relationship requires~~ LOVE - RESPECT & LISTENING TO ONE ANOTHER. Christ Love is so wonderful,once you know Him, its like you NEVER want to go back to the way you was. that goes for anyone or their ways of life. His Love is SO Tender, all He wants to do is hold out His arms and welcome you to the Family. please let Him. Believing that Christ rose from the dead ,please read John 3:16through 18. and Matthew chapter 27. and Acts chapter 16 verse 31. and 1 Corinthians chapter 15: verses 1 thorugh8. These verses will show you that Christ did indeed die for you and rose from the dead. Talking to Him, Serioulsy, with a open heart, asking Him to forgive you of your past path, and then welcome Him into your heart. this is-Prayer-. If you have said a prayer seriously in believing that Christ rose and died from the dead... then, Congrats! High 5^ & {{{{HUGS TO YOU}}}} you are a Christian- Yes, thats all it takes. If anyone that reads this, hasn't prayed and still thinking about it, I Will keep you in prayer. I'd like you to read this below. --------------------------------- Title: ... (0) Comments left |
| The wrongs and rights of ... |
|---|
|
Posted by
Jamesburrow
on Fri May 20 at 02:37:pm
What is wrong with being gay? I am straight, and personally the thought of what gays do is disgusting. But, as I have several gay and bi friends, I don't truly see anything wrong with them. So, as I was formally Catholic and I have read the Bivle from front to back several times, I do not recall exactly where it said homosexuality was wrong. Now, the majority of people who are gay do not choose to be so. Why in the world would someone choose to become something that the majority of the world despises, shuns, and hates? Also, recent studies of a homosexual brain proved that a staright person's and a gay person's brain are different. Yet some sources do claim that these "born gays" can possibly change through therapy yet others say it is impossible for these type of gays to change. There are some gays who did manage to change, but they only cover a very small percentage of the homosexual population. The APA has removed this as a mental disorder and now call it normal. To the statistics: 98% of teenagers have either imagined or had sexual activities with the same sex. I myself had a few times while I was just entering puberty. It is just curiosity and, as the percentage dictates, nearly everyone goes through it. About 2.8% of men and 1.4% or women are gay/bi. With such a small perecntage, why can't they jsut be left alone? However, even though heterosexuals, at 98-99% of our population, do molest more children than homesexuals, around 32% of child molestation cases are homosexual, meaning nearly a thriid of the cases come from 1-2% of the population! Yet, even though there is a high perecntage of molestations committed by homesexuals, only about 15% of homesexuals are found guilty of child molestation, about 22% of heterosexuals are found guilty. This leads to the belief that homesexual molestors will molest more children than heterosexual ones, a greater percentage of heterosexuals are child molestors. (4) Comments left |
| Out of the Shadows |
|---|
|
Posted by
truthsetsfree
on Wed May 18 at 03:20:am
Out of the Shadows Justin R. Cannon Founder of www.truthsetsfree.net It was three years ago and I was a freshman at Earlham College, a Quaker liberal arts college in Richmond, Indiana. Like every other freshman, I had mixed feelings of excitement about all the new people, clubs, and the independence, as well as a little apprehension about so much newness and so much unknown. What I did not know, however, was just how much I would discover that year. National Coming Out day rolled around, I forget the date, but we all knew because of the chalking on the sidewalks that the campus’ GLBTQ group had done the night before. You know, catchy phrases like, “2, 4, 6, 8…don’t assume your grandma’s straight.” The following Friday in the school’s newspaper a conservative Christian student had written a letter to the editor in which he harshly condemned homosexuality using Leviticus 18:22 as his basis. Having been raised in a Christian home, and having felt a calling towards ministry since the eighth grade I was quite aware at the time that his usage of the Leviticus law was quite ironic since Leviticus also condemns shaving one’s beard, eating shrimp, wearing clothing made of two fabrics, etc. As I was writing a response, I recognized that the reason I felt compelled to respond was not simply because he was misusing Scripture or because I wanted to defend my gay friends, but I realized that I was in fact defending myself. It was in writing that letter that I realized I was gay. I finished the letter, pointing out his hypocrisy in using Leviticus, but I knew very well that there were so many other verses in the Bible used to condemn homosexuals. That week began what turned into three years of personal Bible study. I wanted to answer the question, “What exactly does the Bible say about homosexuality?” Nobody knew at this... (1) Comment left |
| Query... |
|---|
|
Posted by
bornagainpagan
on Tue May 17 at 05:03:am
Anyone heard of this lot before? http://www.truthsetsfree.net/ Is this the Metropolotan Community Church under a new Banner or a new group? (16) Comments left |
| PBS's Homophobia Quiz! se... |
|---|
|
Posted by
Aineo
on Tue Apr 12 at 04:53:pm
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/assault/etc/quiz.html Are you homophobic? Take the test and find out. I scored 16, which means I am "high-grade non-homophobic". (25) Comments left |
| Bisexuality |
|---|
|
Posted by
Believer
on Sat Apr 9 at 02:43:am
Peace everyone, How can we explain why many people are this way? Doesn't seem logical people are born liking both sexes. (80) Comments left |
| Why Wouldn't Christan's S... |
|---|
|
Posted by
Tommy J
on Wed Apr 6 at 01:49:pm
I'm posting this not to debate the validity of Gay Marriage but to understand the context of the objection to gay marriage. It seems to me that Christan's would support gay marriage if for no other reason that it would encourage gay people to engage in loving relationships with just one person. Many Christan's who I've come across who are in general opposed to gay people to begin with do so with the argument not only from the book of Leviticus but also arguing that it's a lifestyle of promiscuity. Now, if gay people were encouraged by Christians to marry the second concern would be mitigated. BTW: Christan's can celebrate because Kansas yesterday passed their Marriage Amendment Act. Unfortunately as well it also bans civil unions which could potentially harm people by preventing companies from extending medical benefits to gay couples. <I'm saddened by this> (65) Comments left |
| Some become gay, or "... |
|---|
|
Posted by
Believer
on Sun Apr 3 at 04:25:am
Peace everyone, Being homosexual a "lifestyle". Not to say there aren't exceptions, but many homosexuals have "become" gay, they "converted" to homosexuality...say after some failed marriages. Take Elton John for instance. Also, many homosexuals have "given up" their lifestyle and become heterosexuals as they become Christian and recognize their lifestyle is unnatural and against God's innate laws on sexuality. Since when does someone's sexuality something that can be changed like that...if it weren't something in the mind? Sexuality itself is something in the mind. Sex is physical. Males have penise, and woman have vagina's (can I say that???) Feed back from homosexuals...I'm interested to hear your input on this (5) Comments left |
| A question for straight p... |
|---|
|
Posted by
Pint0 Xtreme
on Sat Mar 19 at 02:45:am
I've got a few questions I've always wanted to ask straight people. 1.) When did you first realize that you were straight? 2.) Were you straight for as long as you could remember? 3.) How do you know you're not going through a phase? 4.) Have you told your friends that you're straight? 5.) Have you told your parents that you're straight? 6.) What do you think of people who say your heterosexuality was a choice? 7.) Do you think your heterosexuality was a choice? 8.) What do you think of people who say you 'flaunt' your heterosexuality? 9.) Do you hold hands in public? 10.) If God said heterosexuality was an abomination, would you give up your sinful lifestyle? Regards, Pint0 Xtreme (74) Comments left |
| 'Homosexuality is a Gift ... |
|---|
|
Posted by
Cross_+_Flame
on Wed Feb 23 at 09:51:pm
Suppose someone said to you the following: I used to be unable to love people, and just had loveless relationships for both the other person, and for God. It wasn't until I was able to understand my homosexuality as a gift from God that I understood how being able to love one other person brings me into the love of God. Now I am a dedicated churchgoer. What would you say to that person? (This is a real life question posed to me. I am in no way promoting the viewpoint here, just posing it as a question to the community) (21) Comments left |
| Masturbation is not a sin... |
|---|
|
Posted by
PatrickMay
on Wed Feb 23 at 04:09:pm
Masturbation is not a sin. Even Jesus did it. I don't have any proof for this, but it's likely he did. (3) Comments left |
| An interesting logo... |
|---|
|
Posted by
Damian
on Tue Feb 22 at 07:18:pm
There's no better place to put this. A logo at a website I go to: Thoughts? (36) Comments left |
| Homosexuality is a Sin Announcements |
|
[align=center:5b37b1b643]
To all these people who promote homosexuality, your theology sounds a lot like the Spirit of the Anti-Christ! Using Christ & Love & Hate as your rallying cry! Trying to convince people to violate their bodies with Sin. Do you not know that you are Teaching people to violate the Temple of God with Sin which is where the Holy Spirit dwells! So then are you not sitting in the temple of God, saying that the Christ you have just created is God. But in reality it's the Anti-Christ! [/align:5b37b1b643] |
| Homosexuality is a Sin Announcements | ||||||||||
|
Here is a list of questions I've seen posted on various Christian message boards regarding the homosexual lifestyle. Along with my responses, of course. 1 - "I was born this way." Yes, there are some people who are born gay, just as there are those who are born straight. For some reason, while you were developing in your mother's womb, something went awry and later on, you discovered that you were sexually attracted to members of your own gender. I was never very good at science, so don't ask me to explain it. (Let's face it. I barely passed my Science classes. LOL) However, I believe that sometimes, people choose to be gay. Take the people of Sodom, for example. They chose to be gay, and they chose to commit homosexual acts because they (the acts) were an affront to the Lord. They hated God so much, they were willing to do anything to anger Him. I also think that homosexuality can be a result of a traumatic event. I once heard of a woman who'd been abused by her father. Because of the sexual abuse she endured for years, she'd formed a distrust of men, which led her to enter same-sex relationships. You should also keep this in mind: I was born straight, and I choose to remain straight. There is a big difference between being born gay and choosing to engage in homosexual activities. You may not have chosen to be gay, but you can choose to avoid the gay lifestyle. Just as I can choose to avoid giving in to my sexual temptations. And yes! I do have temptations. I'm a human being, after all. 2 - "I can't change who I am." Oh, contrare. There's a difference between "can't" and "won't." You don't want to change what you are, but there are some who not only want to leave their homosexuality behind, but succeed. Aineo can attest to that fact. 3 - "Why do you hate me? I'm not doing anything to hurt you." First of all, I don't hate you. Anybody who proclaims himself to be a Christian and announces that he hates you...Well, he obviously doesn't know what it means to be a Christian. If he did, he'd follow Jesus Christ's example. Jesus was known for befriending sinners. Not because He wanted to partake in their sinful lifestyles, but because He loved Mankind. He loved them so much, He suffered a terrible death so that His precious blood could wash away our sins.
Remember, just because people criticize your lifestyle, does not mean that they hate you. If you criticized my lifestyle or beliefs, I would not accuse you of hating me. So please, before you accuse someone of hating you, at least take the time to see their point and to think before you type. USE YOUR HEAD, in other words. Now, on to your second point: yes, you are. Maybe not directly, but you are hurting me. Have you ever heard of Sodom? That city had become so corrupt, and was buried so deep in sin, that God destroyed it. Only a handful of people made it out alive, because they had chosen not to partake in the sinful lifestyle of those around them. I don't want our country - our world, in fact - to suffer the same fate. And yes. I'm aware of the fact that homosexuality is not the only sin that's out there. It's only one of many. But I think you understand the point I was trying to make. And if you don't? (Shrug) Oh, well. Life goes on. 4 - "God made me gay." No, He didn't. He did have a part in your creation, but He did not make you gay. To me, that's the equivalent of saying, "God made your cousins deaf and blind." What happened to my cousins was hereditary. And while God did not make them deaf and blind, He has been helping them lead very productive, happy lives. One thing you might ask yourself is: why would God make me gay when He stated, time and time again, that homosexuality is an abomination? 5 - "Why can't you accept me for who I am?" There's a big difference between who you are and what you are. You are, first and foremost, a human being. And I accept and love you because you are my sister/brother. However, I refuse to accept your lifestyle, because by saying that "gay is okay," I would be damning myself. I don't want to spend my afterlife separated from the love of God. I don't want to subject myself to that torture. 6 - "It's only a sin if I have anal sex with my boyfriend." Perhaps the following Scripture will shed some light.
That means: no anal sex, no oral sex, no manual sex. No sex at all. And no romantic smoochies, either. Especially when you have morning breath. Okay. I so need to get new material. Even I know that one was lame.
7 - "Why is homosexuality a sin?" The following Scriptures will answer this question nicely.
And of course, the obvious: men were not meant to have sex with other men. Just as women were not meant to have sex with women. Take a look at our anatomies. To be blunt, why on earth would Man #1 want to suffer from the uncomfortable sensation that is caused when Man #2 jams his whoo-hoo up Man #1's butt? YEOWCH!! I mean, there's a reason people are terrified of visiting the proctologist's office! 8 - "It is only a sin if I have oral sex with my girlfriend." I believe you should read what I had to say in response to question #6. 9 - "Can I find salvation?" Yes. If you truly believe that your lifestyle is a sin, and if you truly want to be saved, you will be saved.
It's not easy. Visit Aineo's website and read his story. I suggest you read the advice he has to offer. I think the advice rings true for everyone who wants to abandon their sinful lifestyles. http://www.aineotheos.org/ One thing you must remember, above all else, is this: trust in God. He is the the Heavenly Father. He created Man. He created you. He loves you, and He will not lead you astray. Trust Him completely. 10 - "You're not perfect. What right do you have to judge me?" You're right. I'm not perfect. I've sinned. I sin at least once every day. That is the nature of Man. We stumble. Sometimes, we fall. But just like a kid who's fallen off of his bike, we get up, we dust ourselves off and we try again. Eventually, we get it right. Secondly, I'm not judging you. I don't know what it's like to be in your shoes. I don't know what it's like to be confused about my sexuality. However, I do know what it's like to be different. Everybody knows what that's like. Every one of us was created to be unique. Some of us were created to be artists. Some of us - myself included - were created to be writers. Not one of us is more special than the other. As the Constitution states: "All men were created equal." Although I'm not presuming to place judgement upon you, I refuse to keep my mouth shut and hold back my opinion. I've found that no matter what a person's opinion is, there's always at least one person who's offended by that opinion. And as a citizen of the United States of America, I am entitled to the right to express myself freely. Just as you oppose my views on homosexuality, I am allowed to oppose your views. I may not respect your opinion, but I do respect your right to have an opinion. Please respect my right to have an opinion as well. 11 - "What will you do if your child announces that he's gay?" I'll explain to him that, although I will never accept his lifestyle, I will continue to love him. He is my son. He's part of me. I could never hate someone who's a part of me. Anyway, I don't think I'll have to worry about that for a very long time. Need to get me a boyfriend first. |
| Homosexuality is a Sin Announcements |
|
HOMOSEXUALITY IS STILL SIN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- There remains today a perpetual bombardment of the homosexual agenda. Homosexuals are flaunted in this modern-age of "political correctness" as victims and heros for their stand for the right of homosexuality and alternative lifestyles. All who would oppose their position are considered to be bigots. More and more gay and lesbian actors are included in sitcoms and movies as an attempt to soften any objection the average American would feel toward homosexuality. The media has no shame in their left-wing efforts to promote gay and lesbian acceptance, all the while bashing the "right-wing" for its stand against sodomy. Yes, the American society may be growing more lenient of this sinful lifestyle, but the question is: "Is God becoming more tolerant toward homosexuality?" For an honest person, the answer to this question is easy. "Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God" (1 Cor. 6:9-10, cf. Gal. 5:19ff. and 1 Tim. 1:9ff.). "For this cause God gave them [Gentiles] up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet" (Rom 1:25-27). The Scriptures cannot be more explicit on this disputed subject. Some contend that God does not have the same feeling of disapproval of homosexuality as He did in biblical times. Consider, "For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed" (Mal. 3:6). "Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever" (Heb. 13:8, cf. Matt 24:35). God does not waver on His verdict of sin. If God accepts homosexuality today, then why did He destroy Sodom and Gomorrah (Gen. 19)? Jude says, "Even as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire" (Jude 7). God used these cities as examples of His feeling toward debauched societies. If He does not condemn homosexuality today, then He will have to apologize to Sodom and Gomorrah on Judgment Day, "Sorry, you should have been born in America in the 20th century; it’s O.K. there." As Christians, we strongly maintain that God would never say this. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Considering the Homosexual Agenda (Part 1) As Christians, we strongly stand by our God who says that homosexuality is perversion (Rom. 1:26-2. However, we do not want to be misunderstood in our purpose. God does not hate the homosexual, for He sent His Son to die for the gay and lesbian too (John 3:16-17). Neither is our purpose to promote violence toward these persons (two wrongs do not equal a right, cf. Rom. 12:17), nor do we consider the homosexual to be a lesser being. Christians view homosexuals as the Bible says; persons who are in need of God’s forgiveness, and those who God is willing to forgive when they cease their practice of sodomy(i.e. repentance, cf. Luke 13:3). While considering this series of articles, please keep in mind that this author has no ill feelings toward the individuals who are involved in homosexuality; instead, the problem pertains to the sin itself, and with the portrayal of homosexuality as an alternative lifestyle as opposed to God’s divine institution of marriage between male and female (Gen. 2:21-25, Matt 19:1-9). The greatest achievement for the gay and lesbian community is the shifting of the debate from "that of behavior to that of identity." They have succeeded in changing their image from generally being considered sinful and loathsome, to now advocated by liberal politicians and Hollywood as a clean alternative to heterosexual marriage. What happened? Gays and lesbians "coming out of the closet" did not occur by way of chance, but with a planned agenda. Marshall K. Kirk and Erastes Pill wrote an article in the 1997 November issue of Guide Magazine entitled: "The Overhauling of Straight America" in which is listed the gay itinerary. Number one on Kirk and Pill’s list is to, "Talk about gays and gayness as loudly and as often as possible." It was not an arbitrary statement to say that America has been bombarded with the homosexual agenda.. The intent of this strategy is to dull the normal person’s resistance to homosexuality. Once we hear about something long enough, we reach a point when we no longer are alarmed by it. Think of the potential danger that is still lying ahead. What if pedophiles (child molesters) decide to use the same course of action with their debauchery; will we turn away from this too after a period of time? Will pedophiles be deemed victims and heros one day like gays and lesbians in America? Dear reader, this process is already underway. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Considering the Homosexual Agenda (Part 2) Last week we considered the agenda of Homosexuals as given by Marshall K. Kirk and Erastes Pill in Guide Magazine (November, 1997). Number one on their list was, "Talk about gays and gayness as loudly and as often as possible." This they have done for sure! Now, let us consider the second item: "Portray homosexuals as victims, not as aggressive challengers." Number sixteen of the same list serves as a clear illustration of their procedure: Vilification of victimizers: These images should be combined with those of their homosexual victims by a method propagandists call "bracket technique." For example, for a few seconds an unctuous beady-eyed Southern preacher is seen pounding the pulpit in rage about "those sick abominable creatures." While this tirade continues over the sound track, the picture switches to pathetic photos of homosexuals who look, decent, harmless, and likeable; and then we cut back to the poisonous face of the preacher, and so forth. The contrast speaks for itself. The effect is devastating. One can easily observe the dishonesty in their approach. Gays and lesbians have to manipulate the American society’s thinking about homosexuality in order to make their own perverted lifestyle acceptable. What deception! It must be understood that homosexuals do not really care if we accept them or not; they just want their way. Gays and lesbians are not interested in the welfare of American communities, they are selfish and only interested in themselves. Number seventeen proves the previous statement, "We [Kirk and Pill] have sketched out here a blueprint for transforming the social values of straight America. At the core of our program is a media campaign to change the way the average citizens view homosexuality." Christians (Acts 11:26, 1 Peter 4:16, Acts 2:47) are not a perfect people (i.e. not sinlessly perfect, cf. 1 John 1:8-10), but our approach to the community will never be that of deception. We see no need in trying to deceive people into agreeing with us on morals issues, or on any other matter (Rom. 12:21, Jude 3). Christians are to be a "shining light" in the community; "Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven" (Matt. 5:16). We are to, "...provide things honest in the sight of all men" (Rom. 12:17b). Dear reader, is this the method of the homosexual’s agenda? Surely it is not. Do you appreciate being lied to, or perhaps being manipulated into accepting homosexuality? 1. Kent Bailey, "Homosexuality," in Worldliness, ed. Michael Hatcher (Pensacola, FL: Bellview Church of Christ, 1999), 284. 2. Ibid., 285. 3. Ibid. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Considering the Homosexual Agenda (Part 3) Marshall Kirk and Erastes Pill have other tenets on their homosexual agenda. (Some of these we will not discuss, because they are so similar to the ones previously mentioned: e.g. 4. Make homosexuals look good., 5. Make the victimizers look bad., 7. Get on the air with radio and television programs., 9. Encourage favorable homosexual characters in films and television shows. et. a.l.) Another aim is number twelve, "Make homosexuals seem less mysterious; present a series of short spots featuring the boy or girl next door, fresh and appealing, or warm and loveable grandma and grandpa types." In other words, take social relationships that are pure and helpful to society and our children, then try to deceive people into believing that homosexuals are "wholesome" just like our grandparents. This is an attempt by homosexuals, like Kirk and Pill, to make homosexuality appear to be a friendly alternative lifestyle. Do Christians feel that homosexuals are monsters or beasts? No, but their lifestyle is the monstrosity. They have taken what was natural (i.e. in harmony with nature’s laws and purposes, Gen. 2:24-25), and perverted it to satisfy their sinful lust (Rom. 1:24-2. This author has no joy in expressing this to the public. It would be delightful if we did not have to deal with it, but homosexuality exists in our society; thus, the truth needs to be told about the sin of homosexuality, especially for the homosexual’s sake (cf. Ezek 3:17-21). The deceptive process of taking pure relationships such grandparents and neighboring children, and portraying to us that homosexuality is just as beneficial to us socially as these, should be an insult to us. We think more of the relationships of our grandparents and our neighbor’s children than to allow some one (some persons) to deceive us into thinking that homosexuals should be on their level of friendship and trust. We treasure our relationships with our family and friends, but not with homosexuality. "Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter" (Isa. 5:20)! |
| Homosexuality is a Sin Announcements |
|
GOSPEL
(gos'-pel) (to euaggelion): The word gospel is derived from the Anglo-Saxon word which meant "the story concerning God." In the New Testament the Greek word euaggelion, means "good news." It proclaims tidings of deliverance. The word sometimes stands for the record of the life of Our Lord (Mark 1:1), embracing all His teachings, as in Acts 20:24. But the word "gospel" now has a peculiar use, and describes primarily the message which Christianity announces. "Good news" is its significance. It means a gift from God. It is the proclamation of the forgiveness of sins and sonship with God restored through Christ. It means remission of sins and reconciliation with God. The gospel is not only a message of salvation, but also the instrument through which the Holy Spirit works (Rom 1:16). The gospel differs from the law in being known entirely from revelation. It is proclaimed in all its fulness in the revelation given in the New Testament. It is also found, although obscurely, in the Old Testament. It begins with the prophecy concerning the 'seed of the woman' (Gen 3:15), and the promise concerning Abraham, in whom all the nations should be blessed (Gen 12:3; 15:5) and is also indicated in Acts 10:43 and in the argument in Rom 4. In the New Testament the gospel never means simply a book, but rather the message which Christ and His apostles announced. In some places it is called "the gospel of God," as, for example, Rom 1:1; 1 Thess 2:2,9; 1 Tim 1:11. In others it is called "the gospel of Christ" (Mark 1:1; Rom 1:16; 15:19; 1 Cor 9:12,18; Gal 1:7). In another it is called "the gospel of the grace of God" (Acts 20:24); in another "the gospel of peace" (Eph 6:15); in another "the gospel of your salvation" (Eph 1:13); and in yet another "the glorious gospel" (2 Cor 4:4 the King James Version). The gospel is Christ: He is the subject of it, the object of it, and the life of it. It was preached by Him (Matt 4:23; 11:5; Mark 1:14; Luke 4:18 m), by the apostles (Acts 16:10; Rom 1:15; 2:16; 1 Cor 9:16) and by the evangelists (Acts 8:25). [b]We must note the clear antithesis between the law and the gospel. The distinction between the two is important because, as Luther indicates, it contains the substance of all Christian doctrine. "By the law," says he, "nothing else is meant than God's word and command, directing what to do and what to leave undone, and requiring of us obedience of works. But the gospel is such doctrine of the word of God that neither requires our works nor commands us to do anything, but announces the offered grace of the forgiveness of sin and eternal salvation. Here we do nothing, but only receive what is offered through the word." The gospel, then, is the message of God, the teaching of Christianity, the redemption in and by Jesus Christ, the only begotten Son of God, offered to all mankind. And as the gospel is bound up in the life of Christ, His biography and the record of His works, and the proclamation of what He has to offer, are all gathered into this single word, of which no better definition can be given than that of Melanchthon: "The gospel is the gratuitous promise of the remission of sins for Christ's sake." To hold tenaciously that in this gospel we have a supernatural revelation is in perfect consistency with the spirit of scientific inquiry. The gospel, as the whole message and doctrine of salvation, and as chiefly efficacious for contrition, faith, justification, renewal and sanctification, deals with facts of revelation and experience.[/] DAVID H. BAUSLIN (from International Standard Bible Encyclopaedia, Electronic Database Copyright (c)1996 by Biblesoft) |
| Homosexuality is a Sin Announcements |
|
Matthew 7:1-6
The sermon on the mount Our Saviour is here directing us how to conduct ourselves in reference to the faults of others; and his expressions seem intended as a reproof to the scribes and Pharisees, who were very rigid and severe, very magisterial and supercilious, in condemning all about them, as those commonly are, that are proud and conceited in justifying themselves. We have here, I. A caution against judging v. 1, 2. There are those whose office it is to judge-magistrates and ministers. Christ, though he made not himself a Judge, yet came not to unmake them, for by him princes decree justice; but this is directed to private persons, to his disciples, who shall hereafter sit on thrones judging, but not now. Now observe, 1. The prohibition; Judge not. We must judge ourselves, and judge our own acts, but we must not judge our brother, not magisterially assume such an authority over others, as we allow not them over us: since our rule is, to be subject to one another. Be not many masters, James 3:1. We must not sit in the judgment-seat, to make our word a law to every body. We must not judge our brother, that is, we must not speak evil of him, so it is explained, James 4:11. We must not despise him, nor set him at nought, Rom 14:10. We must not judge rashly, nor pass such a judgment upon our brother as has no ground, but is only the product of our own jealousy and ill nature. We must not make the worst of people, nor infer such invidious things from their words and actions as they will not bear. We must not judge uncharitably, unmercifully, nor with a spirit of revenge, and a desire to do mischief. We must not judge of a man's state by a single act, nor of what he is in himself by what he is to us, because in our own cause we are apt to be partial. We must not judge the hearts of others, nor their intentions, for it is God's prerogative to try the heart, and we must not step into his throne; nor must we judge of their eternal state, nor call them hypocrites, reprobates, and castaways; that is stretching beyond our line; what have we to do, thus to judge another man's servant? Counsel him, and help him, but do not judge him. 2. The reason to enforce this prohibition. That ye be not judged. This intimates, (1.) That if we presume to judge others, we may expect to be ourselves judged. He who usurps the bench, shall be called to the bar; he shall be judged of men; commonly none are more censured, than those who are most censorious; every one will have a stone to throw at them; he who, like Ishmael, has his hand, his tongue, against every man, shall, like him, have every man's hand and tongue against him (Gen 16:12); and no mercy shall be shown to the reputation of those that show no mercy to the reputation of others. Yet that is not the worst of it; they shall be judged of God; from him they shall receive the greater condemnation, James 3:1. Both parties must appear before him (Rom 14:10), who, as he will relieve the humble sufferer, will also resist the haughty scorner, and give him enough of judging. (2.) That if we be modest and charitable in our censures of others, and decline judging them, and judge ourselves rather, we shall not be judged of the Lord. As God will forgive those that forgive their brethren; so he will not judge those that will not judge their brethren; the merciful shall find mercy. It is an evidence of humility, charity, and deference to God, and shall be owned and rewarded by him accordingly. See Rom 14:10. The judging of those that judge others is according to the law of retaliation; With what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged, v. 2. The righteous God, in his judgments, often observes a rule of proportion, as in the case of Adonibezek, Judg 1:7. See also Rev 13:10; 18:6. Thus will he be both justified and magnified in his judgments, and all flesh will be silenced before him. With what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again; perhaps in this world, so that men may read their sin in their punishment. Let this deter us from all severity in dealing with our brother. What shall we do when God rises up? Job 31:14. What would become of us, if God should be as exact and severe in judging us, as we are in judging our brethren; if he should weigh us in the same balance? We may justly expect it, if we be extreme to mark what our brethren do amiss. In this, as in other things, the violent dealings of men return upon their own heads. II. Some cautions about reproving. Because we must not judge others, which is a great sin, it does not therefore follow that we must not reprove others, which is a great duty, and may be a means of saving a soul from death; however, it will be a means of saving our souls from sharing in their guilt. Now observe here, 1. It is not every one who is fit to reprove. Those who are themselves guilty of the same faults of which they accuse others, or of worse, bring shame upon themselves, and are not likely to do good to those whom they reprove, v. 3-5. Here is, (1.) A just reproof to the censorious, who quarrel with their brother for small faults, while they allow themselves in great ones; who are quick-sighted to spy a mote in his eye, but are not sensible of a beam in their own; nay, and will be very officious to pull out the mote out of his eye, when they are as unfit to do it as if they were themselves quite blind. Note, [1.] There are degrees in sin: some sins are comparatively but as motes, others as beams; some as a gnat, others as a camel: not that there is any sin little, for there is no little God to sin against; if it be a mote (or splinter, for so it might better be read), it is in the eye; if a gnat, it is in the throat; both painful and perilous, and we cannot be easy or well till they are got out. [2.] Our own sins ought to appear greater to us than the same sins in others: that which charity teaches us to call but a splinter in our brother's eye, true repentance and godly sorrow will teach us to call a beam in our own; for the sins of others must be extenuated, but our own aggravated. [3.] There are many that have beams in their own eyes, and yet do not consider it. They are under the guilt and dominion of very great sins, and yet are not aware of it, but justify themselves, as if they needed no repentance nor reformation; it is as strange that a man can be in such a sinful, miserable condition, and not be aware of it, as that a man should have a beam in him eye, and not consider it; but the god of this world so artfully blinds their minds, that notwithstanding, with great assurance, they say, We see. [4.] It is common for those who are most sinful themselves, and least sensible of it, to be most forward and free in judging and censuring others: the Pharisees, who were most haughty in justifying themselves, were most scornful in condemning others. They were severe upon Christ's disciples for eating with unwashen hands, which was scarcely a mote, while they encouraged men in a contempt of their parents, which was a beam. Pride and uncharitableness are commonly beams in the eyes of those that pretend to be critical and nice in their censures of others. Nay, many are guilty of that secret, which they have the face to punish in others when it is discovered. Cogita tecum, fortasse vitium de quo quereris, si te diligenter excusseris, in sinu invenies; inique publico irasceris crimini tuo-Reflect that perhaps the fault of which you complain, might, on a strict examination, be discovered in yourself; and that it would be unjust publicly to express indignation against your own crime. Seneca, de Beneficiis. But, [5.] Men's being so severe upon the faults of others, while they are indulgent of their own, is a mark of hypocrisy. Thou hypocrite, v. 5. Whatever such a one may pretend, it is certain that he is no enemy to sin (if he were, he would be an enemy to his own sin), and therefore he is not worthy of praise; nay, it appears that he is an enemy to his brother, and therefore worthy of blame. This spiritual charity must begin at home; "For how canst thou say, how canst thou for shame say, to thy brother, Let me help to reform thee, when thou takest no care to reform thyself? Thy own heart will upbraid thee with the absurdity of it; thou wilt do it with an ill grace, and thou wilt expect every one to tell thee, that vice corrects sin: physician, heal thyself;" I prae, sequar-Go you before, I will follow. See Rom 2:21. [6.] The consideration of what is amiss in ourselves, though it ought not to keep us from administering friendly reproof, ought to keep us from magisterial censuring, and to make us very candid and charitable in judging others. "Therefore restore with the spirit of meekness, considering thyself (Gal 6:1); what thou has been, what thou art, and what thou wouldst be, if God should leave thee to thyself." (2.) Here is a good rule for reprovers, v. 5. Go in the right method, first cast the beam out of thine own eye. Our own badness is so far from excusing us in not reproving, that our being by it rendered unfit to reprove is an aggravation of our badness; I must not say, "I have a beam in my own eye, and therefore I will not help my brother with the mote out of his." A man's offence will never be his defence: but I must first reform myself, that I may thereby help to reform my brother, and may qualify myself to reprove him. Note, Those who blame others, ought to be blameless and harmless themselves. Those who are reprovers in the gate, reprovers by office, magistrates and ministers, are concerned to walk circumspectly, and to be very regular in their conversation: an elder must have a good report, 1 Tim 3:2,7. The snuffers of the sanctuary were to be of pure gold. 2. It is not every one that is fit to be reproved; Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, v. 6. This may be considered, either, (1.) As a rule to the disciples in preaching the gospel; not that they must not preach it to any one who were wicked and profane (Christ himself preached to publicans and sinners), but the reference is to such as they found obstinate after the gospel was preached to them, such as blasphemed it, and persecuted the preachers of it; let them not spend much time among such, for it would be lost labour, but let them turn to others, Acts 13:41. So Dr. Whitby. Or, (2.) As a rule to all in giving reproof. Our zeal against sin must be guided by discretion, and we must not go about to give instructions, counsels, and rebukes, much less comforts, to hardened scorners, to whom it will certainly do no good, but who will be exasperated and enraged at us. Throw a pearl to a swine, and he will resent it, as if you threw a stone at him; reproofs will be called reproaches, as they were (Luke 11:45; Jer 6:10), therefore give not to dogs and swine (unclean creatures) holy things. Note, [1.] Good counsel and reproof are a holy thing, and a pearl: they are ordinances of God, they are precious; as an ear-ring of gold, and an ornament of fine gold, so is the wise reprover (Prov 25:12), and a wise reproof is like an excellent oil (Ps 141:5); it is a tree of life (Prov 3:1 [2.] Among the generation of the wicked, there are some that have arrived at such a pitch of wickedness, that they are looked upon as dogs and swine; they are impudently and notoriously vile; they have so long walked in the way of sinners, that they have sat down in the seat of the scornful; they professedly hate and despise instruction, and set it at defiance, so that they are irrecoverably and irreclaimably wicked; they return with the dog to his vomit, and with the sow to her wallowing in the mire. [3.] Reproofs of instruction are ill bestowed upon such, and expose the reprover to all the contempt and mischief that may be expected from dogs and swine. One can expect no other than that they will trample the reproofs under their feet, in scorn of them, and rage against them; for they are impatient of control and contradiction; and they will turn again and rend the reprovers; rend their good names with their revilings, return them wounding words for their healing ones; rend them with persecution; Herod rent John Baptist for his faithfulness. See here what is the evidence of men's being dogs and swine. Those are to be reckoned such, who hate reproofs and reprovers, and fly in the face of those who, in kindness to their souls, show them their sin and danger. These sin against the remedy; who shall heal and help those that will not be healed and helped? It is plain that God has determined to destroy such. 2 Chron 25:16. The rule here given is applicable to the distinguishing, sealing ordinances of the gospel; which must not be prostituted to those who are openly wicked and profane, lest holy things be thereby rendered contemptible, and unholy persons be thereby hardened. It is not meet to take the children's bread, and cast it to the dogs. Yet we must be very cautious whom we condemn as dogs and swine, and not do it till after trial, and upon full evidence. Many a patient is lost, by being thought to be so, who, if means had been used, might have been saved. As we must take heed of calling the good, bad, by judging all professors to be hypocrites; so we must take heed of calling the bad, desperate, by judging all the wicked to be dogs and swine. [4.] Our Lord Jesus is very tender of the safety of his people, and would not have them needlessly to expose themselves to the fury of those that will turn again and rend them. Let them not be righteous over much, so as to destroy themselves. Christ makes the law of self-preservation one of his own laws, and precious is the blood of his subjects to him. (from Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible: New Modern Edition, Electronic Database. Copyright (c) 1991 by Hendrickson Publishers, Inc.) |
Exposed Homosexual Child Molesters
SIN, Hebrew first use in the bible! More then just missing the mark!
Strong's Number: 2403
Transliterated: chatta'ah
Phonetic: khat-taw-aw'
Text: or chattacth {khat-tawth'}; from 2398; an offence (sometimes habitual sinfulness),
and its penalty, occasion, sacrifice, or expiation; also (concretely) an offender:
-punishment (of sin), purifying(-fication for sin), sin(-ner, offering).
|
All comments and suggestions about this web site are very welcome and a valuable source of information for us. Thanks! |
|
Ex-Gay Links & Homosexual Links :: Captives Set Free by Jesus Christ! Just copy the code below |